Many racket of auraspeeed especially 100x. I don't know about 90k, 90k2, 90k metallic, 70, 60 hypersonic, and low end like snp, 8000 and 9000. Is it only real or not?
So just 100x or all or maybe some? So do you know about ARS-CY, PB, 90s, LJH, 90F, 77F, HANG, 98K, 80X, Crayon then? They seem like real rackets to me.
I want to buy cy rackets but confuse between tk, as, dx. I have tkfe for power and n7ii light for speed. I think want drivex but auraspeed is good colour
My 100x is serving me very well. Seems pretty tuff to me. Strung with 26lbs LN no.1 Anyway once u have a clash....cannot deem the quality is bad. If the racket cave in during stringing or during play yes that's considered bad. Victor has improved since the trouble days of JS10 and 12. Those 2 were bad, the strings can pull through the grommets. Lightweight racket will never be tuff and as manufacturers push the limits with new materials, we paying customers unfortunately will have to be their testing bed. Also your tensioning. If max rated is 24lbs, anything above it u are actually going above recommendation. So if manufacturers are not confident, we can't string 28lbs then go at them? Ya I know who plays with 24lbs or less right, but manufacturers are Conservative...YY better nowdays going to 28lbs. Previously top tier rackets in 4U going max 26Lbs only. Also batch issue. I believe manufacturers will improve the latest batch if previously many reports of crush frames on stringing machines. JS series was infamous for that. But at the moment now such rackets, except the 1st batch of 1000zz? Seems to be very crispy, so on impact, likely crack. Also how abt awhile back the Astrox 77 or 99 series...squeaky sound at the cone when we swing it? My Astrox 77 did have a slight sound but acceptable to me. Eventually the paint on the top of the cone peel, meaning there is lot of movement there so the sound I guess. So good luck and have fun.
